A Travelogue of the Interior

faith questions

World Vision Waffles While the Church Throws a Giant Hissyfit


First came the news that World Vision U.S. was changing its policy and would from here on out allow for the hiring of legally married, gay Christians.

Progressive Christians applauded World Vision’s stance, fist-pumping that this is what Jesus would do too and “take that you Conservative bigots who hate gay people,” while Conservative Christians denounced the decision as an unbiblical, cowardly kowtowing to popular culture and called for World Vision sponsors to prove their commitment to Jesus by withholding food, shelter and education from the poor to advance a political agenda.

Then came the news that World Vision U.S. had reversed it stance, issued an apology for causing global consternation, and would return to it’s previous policy of abstinence for all unmarried Christians, which by definition includes gay Christians because they believe gay marriage is a biblical oxymoron.

Conservative Christians took over the fist-pumping, with “well duh’s” being sung stridently to the choir and “thank God I can keep feeding my World Vision child with a clean conscience” while Progressive Christians threw around a lot of WTFs  and demonized the Christian Establishment as a money-grubbing patriarchy that hates gays more than it loves poor children.

It’s been an awesome couple of days in Christendom, don’t you think?

The irony of course is that the stated reason for World Vision’s inclusion of married gay Christians in their employment ranks was to model Christian unity.

I was awake a lot last night — you know that fatigue that sets in when you are so freakishly tired you can’t even sleep? That’s me these days.

I pondered a lot of mundane things during the dark hours of last night: I need a new title for my book. Does the concussion band my daughter wears in soccer games really protect her noggin, and why oh why does an 8 year old have homework?

But mostly I thought about Jesus and World Vision and I kept picturing this scene in my head where we are all there, standing around in a big dusty circle pointing fingers at each other and loudly making our arguments, all shaky on the inside because the adrenaline is pumping while the camera crews film our Atticus Finch-like epic takedown of the opposition and because this matters and then … then He squats down and draws in the dust.

What is he drawing? We don’t know.  We didn’t know then and we don’t know now. What we do know is that everyone walked away that day from that dusty circle needing to repent. 

The self-righteous needed to repent, and for them Jesus modeled humility and grace.

The sinners needed to repent, and to them Jesus offered forgiveness and healing-in-community.

The religious needed to repent, and to them Jesus offered unfettered freedom to be a blessing to the nations.

In other words, Jesus surprised everyone. He took people where they were and to each He gave an essential vision of His Father’s Kingdom — and that small, incomplete glimpse changed the self-righteous into humble servants, the sinners into bold evangelists, the religious into risk-takers.

How did we come to the place this week where we hurl insults at each other right over the head of our Lord and Savior while he squats in the dust to show us a different way?

I’m guilty too. I have started and then edited and then erased more comments on more blogs on this World Vision fiasco than I care to admit. I have spoken in self-righteous anger. I have felt myself justified by the Bible. I have fist-pumped and shaken with adrenaline and what I most need to repent of is this notion that anything about how I think and behave reflects the face of the One I love most in the world.

Yes, ideas matter. Yes, theology matters. Yes, there is room for a hearty discussion about World Vision’s policies and decisions — even hand waving and hand wringing and disagreements and “OMG you can’t possibly believe that!” with (gasp) even raised voices and red faces. Yes, there is room for all of that. We must learn to trust each other and hold discursive and emotional space for each other along this journey toward shalom.

The question then is, how do we function in the midst of our disagreements, as profound and essential as they are, and live up to our calling as the arms and legs and feet and face of Jesus in this cultural moment? Big question, and I don’t have the answer, but I think part of it is this:

knowing we will be misunderstood, knowing we will be betrayed, knowing the tension will not be resolved, knowing what comes next will hurt, knowing that something far bigger is at stake than our theological framework, we pick up the basin and the towel and we kneel before our brother and even before our betrayer and we wash their feet.





Author: karen d

Thinker, Dreamer, Traveler. Recovering Pharisee.

3 thoughts on “World Vision Waffles While the Church Throws a Giant Hissyfit

  1. Love where you land on this one but, please, PLEASE don’t buy into the “we think our theology is so correct we won’t send money to care for hungry orphans anymore” That’s BS and you know it! No one said they won’t still support the hungry – they’ll just find an organization that adheres to their theology better. Condeming those who pulled their funding from World vision when they LEFT their original statement of belief is not fair. Secular groups remove their funding when disappointed with the organization’s choices. I give you The Susan G Komen Foundation as just one example. They decided to stop funding abortions and their supporters screamed for a reversal, mostly by pulling funding. I know you know this, but I had to just put it out there…Thoughts?


    • Stessie! hi! In this case I am going to hold my ground. I read quite literally hundreds, maybe even thousands of comments and their corresponding stories and the vast majority of conservative Christians were not only removing their sponsorship of WV but aggressively encouraging others to do the same. Had they simply been giving money to an organization — let’s say tithing at a church, or sending an aid check to the Red Cross, fine, pull your dollars and give them to an organization you line up with theologically. But these were people who had taken on Actual Living Breathing Children as sponsors. I would hope that their commitment was not to World Vision but to that child and before GOD to care for a particular human being. I don’t care what happens organizationally in World Vision. You do not withdraw from a caring, committed relationship with someone who is depending on you so as to register your disapproval because some politicians made a decision you disagree with.

      The comparison to Komen is actually revelatory — how appalling that the Church behaved in the exact same way as a secular organization motivated by power and money.

      Other than that I have no opinion 🙂

      And I reiterate, the progressives behaved Just As Badly. None of us came out guiltless from that fiasco, which I why I wrote about repentance. It was for me as much as anyone.



  2. YES. I’m with you, Kare. Really good stuff.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s